From assumptions to useful experiments.

1. Read the fictional studio challenge.
2. Write one observation and one interpretation separately.
3. Share the distinction with a partner.

A fictional studio sees first-time visitors pause at a wall of plant choices. What was observed? What explanations are still assumptions?

1. Name the visitor and the moment.
2. List the assumptions affecting the next decision.
3. Choose one assumption to investigate.
4. Write a question that a small test could answer.

Write: For [audience] in [situation], we need to learn [uncertainty] before deciding [next action].

1. Sketch a care card, a welcome sign and a guided question.
2. Name what each option could reveal.
3. Choose the simplest option that tests the selected uncertainty.

Describe three possible tests. For each, list the learning value, time needed and one limitation.

1. Name the method and permitted participants or sources.
2. Write the exact prompt or observation protocol.
3. Define the smallest useful output.
4. Name risks, permissions and stopping conditions.

Create a test plan with method, source, protocol, output and stopping conditions. Use fictional participants in this exercise.

1. Name the observable signal.
2. Write what would support the next step.
3. Write what would weaken the idea.
4. Explain when the evidence would be inconclusive.

Complete: We will observe [signal]. If [support], we will [action]. If [contradiction], we will [change]. If [inconclusive], we will [follow-up].

1. Trade worksheets and name one observable improvement.
2. Use the practice questions to revisit a gap.
3. Revise the plan and download your local worksheet.

What changed after peer review? What is the next question, who owns it and what evidence would change your mind?