Nia Rowan
Fictional portfolio · original interface studies · all numerical results are illustrative

Product / Case 01

A calmer way through the morning commute.

A fictional transit pass flow that brings route choice, fare clarity and a useful next step into one considered sequence.

Role: Research framing, interaction design and engineering handoffEight-week fictional conceptPermission reviewed

The challenge.

A first-time rider must choose a route, understand the fare and activate a pass while standing in a busy station. The original concept separated these decisions across several competing screens.

Constraints

  • The concept must remain usable during a short, distracted visit.
  • Fare rules are supplied assumptions requiring operator review.
  • No ticket purchase or real travel account is connected.

The approach.

Map the first-ride decision before drawing components. Separate the rider's route question from account setup, compare two low-fidelity flows and design a small handoff around the selected sequence.

  1. Lead with the route

    The supplied fictional walkthrough suggests that the next useful decision is where the rider is going, not which account field they should fill in.

    Sources: transit-study

  2. Keep the fare explanation close

    Show the assumed price and validity window next to the selected route. Operator policy must be reviewed before using this in a real ticket flow.

    Sources: transit-study

  3. End with a visible activation step

    Make the difference between selecting a pass and activating it explicit. The illustrative pilot values below exercise the result export, not a real measured claim.

    Sources: transit-pilot

Make the change visible.

Original interface studies illustrating the reviewed decisions. They are not customer screenshots.

A route-first sequence keeps fare and activation togetherAccount setup competes with route choice and pass rules

Before: Account setup competes with route choice and pass rules. After: A route-first sequence keeps fare and activation together.

Results, with their boundaries.

FICTIONAL84%

Illustrative task completion

Baseline: 62%
+22 percentage points

Source: transit-pilot
FICTIONAL2.8min

Illustrative time to a pass

Baseline: 4.5min
-37.78% relative change

Source: transit-pilot

All numbers in this fictional example are illustrative; they are not evidence of real uplift.

What I learned.

A short flow can still hide an important decision. The useful unit of design was a route, a policy explanation and an activation state, not the number of screens alone.

The next question

Review fare policy with a real operator and test the route-first concept with permitted participants before making any effectiveness claim.

Evidence register

Next case: Everyday food, without the guesswork. ↗