{
  "title": "A clearer first useful moment.",
  "demo": true,
  "question": "Where does a new team lose confidence between choosing a workflow and putting its first result to work?",
  "notesHash": "fbc525df66bc6b4898244193ca190864dc8f370aa1ea3ec993789977e6d0a556",
  "limitations": "Seven fictional participants for a worked example. Frequency describes this small supplied study; it does not establish market prevalence or product uplift. Severity and effort are authored judgments.",
  "nextQuestions": [
    "What did you expect the first completed result to contain?",
    "Show the point where you switched from browsing to trying the workflow.",
    "How would you check that a teammate can reproduce the result?",
    "What would make a shorter setup sufficient for your team?"
  ],
  "themes": [
    {
      "id": "first-win",
      "title": "Show the first win before the setup.",
      "interpretation": "Several participants want a concrete finished result before navigating installation. A useful preview may bridge the choice-to-use gap.",
      "supportIds": [
        "o1",
        "o2",
        "o3",
        "o4",
        "o11"
      ],
      "contradictIds": [
        "o9"
      ],
      "severity": 5,
      "effort": 2,
      "action": "Add one complete sample, its download list and a three-step first run beside the primary install action.",
      "owner": "Product & design",
      "acceptance": "In the next usability round, a participant can identify the expected files and locate the first run without opening unrelated setup panels."
    },
    {
      "id": "editable-handoff",
      "title": "The deliverable includes the source.",
      "interpretation": "An attractive preview is useful, while an editable artifact and acceptance checklist support actual team handoff.",
      "supportIds": [
        "o7",
        "o8",
        "o10",
        "o13"
      ],
      "contradictIds": [],
      "severity": 4,
      "effort": 2,
      "action": "Expose editable file formats, acceptance checks and the delivery owner in the result preview.",
      "owner": "Content operations",
      "acceptance": "A reviewer can distinguish rendered output, editable source and evidence files before download."
    },
    {
      "id": "version-trust",
      "title": "Keep the team on a known version.",
      "interpretation": "Version visibility is relevant to repeatable team use, though this study has only two supporting participants.",
      "supportIds": [
        "o5",
        "o6",
        "o14"
      ],
      "contradictIds": [],
      "severity": 4,
      "effort": 3,
      "action": "Show the active version, update notes and preserved older downloads in the account library.",
      "owner": "Engineering",
      "acceptance": "A teammate can identify the installed version and explain which source produced an older deliverable."
    },
    {
      "id": "progressive-setup",
      "title": "Let experienced teams move quickly.",
      "interpretation": "The shorter path already works for one experienced participant. Preserve a compact install path while offering deeper guidance on demand.",
      "supportIds": [
        "o9",
        "o12"
      ],
      "contradictIds": [
        "o2"
      ],
      "severity": 3,
      "effort": 2,
      "action": "Keep a concise default first run and put extra setup guidance behind a clearly named disclosure.",
      "owner": "Design systems",
      "acceptance": "First-time and experienced participants can choose the appropriate depth of guidance."
    }
  ]
}