{
  "lean": {
    "schemaVersion": 1,
    "name": "Beacon / Q4 planning room",
    "period": "October–December 2026",
    "unit": "person-days",
    "reachWindow": "Eligible fictional workspaces per quarter",
    "multiplier": 0.7,
    "goals": [
      {
        "id": "activation",
        "title": "Get teams to a first useful result",
        "metric": "First-result rate within 7 days",
        "baseline": "Fictional baseline: 38%",
        "target": "Hypothesis: 50% after the pilot",
        "measurement": "Cohort comparison over 4 weeks; exclude internal accounts"
      },
      {
        "id": "trust",
        "title": "Make collaboration dependable",
        "metric": "Successful review and export tasks",
        "baseline": "Fictional usability benchmark: 7/12 successful tasks",
        "target": "Hypothesis: 10/12 tasks in the next usability round",
        "measurement": "Moderated 12-task study; report unique participants and failures"
      }
    ],
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "e1",
        "source": "Fictional usability notes / session 01",
        "observation": "Two first-time teams started with an empty board and could not identify the next action."
      },
      {
        "id": "e2",
        "source": "Fictional support review / week 40",
        "observation": "Three export tickets described missing Unicode labels in CSV handoffs."
      },
      {
        "id": "e3",
        "source": "Fictional research / session 03",
        "observation": "A project lead asked for a durable shared review state, rather than another notification."
      },
      {
        "id": "e4",
        "source": "Fictional discovery / session 04",
        "observation": "A specialist needs keyboard navigation and a clear focus indicator on the board."
      },
      {
        "id": "e5",
        "source": "Fictional opportunity note / 05",
        "observation": "Two team leads requested reusable templates; each already has a different workflow."
      },
      {
        "id": "e6",
        "source": "Fictional engineering spike / 06",
        "observation": "An API requires stable permissions and versioned export schemas first."
      },
      {
        "id": "e7",
        "source": "Fictional analytics review / 07",
        "observation": "The activation event name is ambiguous and does not distinguish generated versus saved output."
      },
      {
        "id": "e8",
        "source": "Fictional mobile observation / 08",
        "observation": "Capturing a short note on a phone failed after an interrupted connection."
      }
    ],
    "rows": [
      {
        "id": "starter-templates",
        "title": "Opinionated starter templates",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Teams need a useful starting point without a long setup.",
        "reach": 640,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 7,
        "dependsOn": [
          "accessible-foundation"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e1",
          "e5"
        ],
        "decision": "Provide three editable starting workflows and explain who each is for.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Provide three editable starting workflows and explain who each is for.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Templates preserve original content and support an empty-start option.",
              "Given an existing workspace, applying a template creates a separate draft rather than overwriting it."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "No release has sufficient remaining team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 146.285714,
        "deadlineRisk": true,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "activation-events",
        "title": "An unambiguous activation event",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "The team cannot distinguish starting a task from delivering value.",
        "reach": 800,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 5,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e7"
        ],
        "decision": "Define generated, saved and shared events with an event contract.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Define generated, saved and shared events with an event contract.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The event dictionary separates draft generation from successful persistence.",
              "Given repeated retries, the first-success metric counts one successful save per workspace."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 128.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "export-integrity",
        "title": "Exports that survive the handoff",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Exported records lose important labels at handoff.",
        "reach": 420,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 1,
        "effort": 8,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "in-progress",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e2"
        ],
        "decision": "Preserve Unicode text, stable IDs and explicit column semantics.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Preserve Unicode text, stable IDs and explicit column semantics.",
            "acceptance": [
              "A CSV export re-imports Unicode and quoted delimiters without changes.",
              "Given a formula-looking label, spreadsheet export treats it as text."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "next",
        "releaseIndex": 1,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 105.0,
        "deadlineRisk": true,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "accessible-foundation",
        "title": "Keyboard-first component foundation",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Board interactions lack consistent focus and keyboard behavior.",
        "reach": 500,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 1,
        "effort": 6,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "done",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e4"
        ],
        "decision": "Create a documented focus and tab-order contract.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Create a documented focus and tab-order contract.",
            "acceptance": [
              "An explicit keyboard interaction map exists for tabs, lists and dialogs.",
              "Given a keyboard-only session, every primary action is reachable without a trap."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "done",
        "releaseIndex": -1,
        "reason": "Already completed",
        "rice": 83.333333,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "guided-first-run",
        "title": "A guided first useful result",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "New teams do not know how to progress from the first screen.",
        "reach": 620,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 12,
        "dependsOn": [
          "starter-templates"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e1",
          "e7"
        ],
        "decision": "Guide the user through one complete save-and-share task.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Guide the user through one complete save-and-share task.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Progress survives a reload and the user can skip or resume.",
              "Given a failed save, the UI retains the draft and offers a retry without duplicating the result."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "next",
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Unscheduled dependency: starter-templates",
        "rice": 82.666667,
        "deadlineRisk": true,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "review-room",
        "title": "One shared review room",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Reviewers cannot tell which saved version a comment refers to.",
        "reach": 310,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 11,
        "dependsOn": [
          "export-integrity"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e3"
        ],
        "decision": "Tie feedback to a version and provide an explicit approval state.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Tie feedback to a version and provide an explicit approval state.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Feedback retains the reviewed artifact ID and its version.",
              "Given two parallel reviews, approvals refer to the correct version and do not silently overwrite each other."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "next",
        "release": "later",
        "releaseIndex": 2,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 45.090909,
        "deadlineRisk": true,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "mobile-capture",
        "title": "Reliable notes on the move",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Interrupted mobile connections can lose a short note.",
        "reach": 200,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "effort": 13,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "blocked",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e8"
        ],
        "decision": "Prototype a recoverable draft and test the conflict behavior.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Prototype a recoverable draft and test the conflict behavior.",
            "acceptance": [
              "A local draft is recoverable after a simulated interrupted save.",
              "Given two drafts for the same note, the user can inspect both before choosing."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Explicitly blocked",
        "rice": 7.692308,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "public-api",
        "title": "The first portable API surface",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Integrations need a stable permission and export model.",
        "reach": 120,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "effort": 20,
        "dependsOn": [
          "export-integrity",
          "review-room"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e6"
        ],
        "decision": "Ship a read-only API after the handoff contract is stable.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Ship a read-only API after the handoff contract is stable.",
            "acceptance": [
              "All read endpoints enforce the documented workspace permissions.",
              "Given a revoked token, the API denies access without disclosing another workspace."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "No release has sufficient remaining team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 6.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "executive-summary",
        "title": "A weekly executive summary",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "A summary request has no evidence of recurring usage.",
        "reach": 60,
        "impact": 0.5,
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "effort": 5,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "deferred",
        "evidenceIds": [],
        "decision": "Interview two intended readers before designing another report.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Interview two intended readers before designing another report.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The discovery record identifies a real decision and required source data.",
              "Given insufficient evidence, the roadmap keeps the idea outside committed capacity."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Explicitly deferred",
        "rice": 1.8,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": true
      }
    ],
    "capacity": [
      {
        "id": "now",
        "name": "Now · Foundation",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 11.2,
            "used": 5.0,
            "remaining": 6.2
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 5.6,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 5.6
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "next",
        "name": "Next · First value",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 15.4,
            "used": 8.0,
            "remaining": 7.4
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 4.9,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 4.9
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "later",
        "name": "Later · Expansion",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 12.6,
            "used": 11.0,
            "remaining": 1.6
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 3.5,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 3.5
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "algorithm": "Dependency-ready RICE greedy planning; finish-to-start across releases; indivisible team effort. A transparent heuristic, not an optimal project scheduler."
  },
  "baseline": {
    "schemaVersion": 1,
    "name": "Beacon / Q4 planning room",
    "period": "October–December 2026",
    "unit": "person-days",
    "reachWindow": "Eligible fictional workspaces per quarter",
    "multiplier": 1,
    "goals": [
      {
        "id": "activation",
        "title": "Get teams to a first useful result",
        "metric": "First-result rate within 7 days",
        "baseline": "Fictional baseline: 38%",
        "target": "Hypothesis: 50% after the pilot",
        "measurement": "Cohort comparison over 4 weeks; exclude internal accounts"
      },
      {
        "id": "trust",
        "title": "Make collaboration dependable",
        "metric": "Successful review and export tasks",
        "baseline": "Fictional usability benchmark: 7/12 successful tasks",
        "target": "Hypothesis: 10/12 tasks in the next usability round",
        "measurement": "Moderated 12-task study; report unique participants and failures"
      }
    ],
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "e1",
        "source": "Fictional usability notes / session 01",
        "observation": "Two first-time teams started with an empty board and could not identify the next action."
      },
      {
        "id": "e2",
        "source": "Fictional support review / week 40",
        "observation": "Three export tickets described missing Unicode labels in CSV handoffs."
      },
      {
        "id": "e3",
        "source": "Fictional research / session 03",
        "observation": "A project lead asked for a durable shared review state, rather than another notification."
      },
      {
        "id": "e4",
        "source": "Fictional discovery / session 04",
        "observation": "A specialist needs keyboard navigation and a clear focus indicator on the board."
      },
      {
        "id": "e5",
        "source": "Fictional opportunity note / 05",
        "observation": "Two team leads requested reusable templates; each already has a different workflow."
      },
      {
        "id": "e6",
        "source": "Fictional engineering spike / 06",
        "observation": "An API requires stable permissions and versioned export schemas first."
      },
      {
        "id": "e7",
        "source": "Fictional analytics review / 07",
        "observation": "The activation event name is ambiguous and does not distinguish generated versus saved output."
      },
      {
        "id": "e8",
        "source": "Fictional mobile observation / 08",
        "observation": "Capturing a short note on a phone failed after an interrupted connection."
      }
    ],
    "rows": [
      {
        "id": "starter-templates",
        "title": "Opinionated starter templates",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Teams need a useful starting point without a long setup.",
        "reach": 640,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 7,
        "dependsOn": [
          "accessible-foundation"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e1",
          "e5"
        ],
        "decision": "Provide three editable starting workflows and explain who each is for.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Provide three editable starting workflows and explain who each is for.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Templates preserve original content and support an empty-start option.",
              "Given an existing workspace, applying a template creates a separate draft rather than overwriting it."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 146.285714,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "activation-events",
        "title": "An unambiguous activation event",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "The team cannot distinguish starting a task from delivering value.",
        "reach": 800,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 5,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e7"
        ],
        "decision": "Define generated, saved and shared events with an event contract.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Define generated, saved and shared events with an event contract.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The event dictionary separates draft generation from successful persistence.",
              "Given repeated retries, the first-success metric counts one successful save per workspace."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 128.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "export-integrity",
        "title": "Exports that survive the handoff",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Exported records lose important labels at handoff.",
        "reach": 420,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 1,
        "effort": 8,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "in-progress",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e2"
        ],
        "decision": "Preserve Unicode text, stable IDs and explicit column semantics.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Preserve Unicode text, stable IDs and explicit column semantics.",
            "acceptance": [
              "A CSV export re-imports Unicode and quoted delimiters without changes.",
              "Given a formula-looking label, spreadsheet export treats it as text."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 105.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "accessible-foundation",
        "title": "Keyboard-first component foundation",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Board interactions lack consistent focus and keyboard behavior.",
        "reach": 500,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 1,
        "effort": 6,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "done",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e4"
        ],
        "decision": "Create a documented focus and tab-order contract.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Create a documented focus and tab-order contract.",
            "acceptance": [
              "An explicit keyboard interaction map exists for tabs, lists and dialogs.",
              "Given a keyboard-only session, every primary action is reachable without a trap."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "done",
        "releaseIndex": -1,
        "reason": "Already completed",
        "rice": 83.333333,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "guided-first-run",
        "title": "A guided first useful result",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "New teams do not know how to progress from the first screen.",
        "reach": 620,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 12,
        "dependsOn": [
          "starter-templates"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e1",
          "e7"
        ],
        "decision": "Guide the user through one complete save-and-share task.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Guide the user through one complete save-and-share task.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Progress survives a reload and the user can skip or resume.",
              "Given a failed save, the UI retains the draft and offers a retry without duplicating the result."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "next",
        "release": "next",
        "releaseIndex": 1,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 82.666667,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "review-room",
        "title": "One shared review room",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Reviewers cannot tell which saved version a comment refers to.",
        "reach": 310,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 11,
        "dependsOn": [
          "export-integrity"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e3"
        ],
        "decision": "Tie feedback to a version and provide an explicit approval state.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Tie feedback to a version and provide an explicit approval state.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Feedback retains the reviewed artifact ID and its version.",
              "Given two parallel reviews, approvals refer to the correct version and do not silently overwrite each other."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "next",
        "release": "later",
        "releaseIndex": 2,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 45.090909,
        "deadlineRisk": true,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "mobile-capture",
        "title": "Reliable notes on the move",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Interrupted mobile connections can lose a short note.",
        "reach": 200,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "effort": 13,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "blocked",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e8"
        ],
        "decision": "Prototype a recoverable draft and test the conflict behavior.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Prototype a recoverable draft and test the conflict behavior.",
            "acceptance": [
              "A local draft is recoverable after a simulated interrupted save.",
              "Given two drafts for the same note, the user can inspect both before choosing."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Explicitly blocked",
        "rice": 7.692308,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "public-api",
        "title": "The first portable API surface",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Integrations need a stable permission and export model.",
        "reach": 120,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "effort": 20,
        "dependsOn": [
          "export-integrity",
          "review-room"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e6"
        ],
        "decision": "Ship a read-only API after the handoff contract is stable.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Ship a read-only API after the handoff contract is stable.",
            "acceptance": [
              "All read endpoints enforce the documented workspace permissions.",
              "Given a revoked token, the API denies access without disclosing another workspace."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "No release has sufficient remaining team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 6.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "executive-summary",
        "title": "A weekly executive summary",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "A summary request has no evidence of recurring usage.",
        "reach": 60,
        "impact": 0.5,
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "effort": 5,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "deferred",
        "evidenceIds": [],
        "decision": "Interview two intended readers before designing another report.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Interview two intended readers before designing another report.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The discovery record identifies a real decision and required source data.",
              "Given insufficient evidence, the roadmap keeps the idea outside committed capacity."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Explicitly deferred",
        "rice": 1.8,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": true
      }
    ],
    "capacity": [
      {
        "id": "now",
        "name": "Now · Foundation",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 16.0,
            "used": 13.0,
            "remaining": 3.0
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 8.0,
            "used": 7.0,
            "remaining": 1.0
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "next",
        "name": "Next · First value",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 22.0,
            "used": 12.0,
            "remaining": 10.0
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 7.0,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 7.0
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "later",
        "name": "Later · Expansion",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 18.0,
            "used": 11.0,
            "remaining": 7.0
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 5.0,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 5.0
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "algorithm": "Dependency-ready RICE greedy planning; finish-to-start across releases; indivisible team effort. A transparent heuristic, not an optimal project scheduler."
  },
  "expanded": {
    "schemaVersion": 1,
    "name": "Beacon / Q4 planning room",
    "period": "October–December 2026",
    "unit": "person-days",
    "reachWindow": "Eligible fictional workspaces per quarter",
    "multiplier": 1.25,
    "goals": [
      {
        "id": "activation",
        "title": "Get teams to a first useful result",
        "metric": "First-result rate within 7 days",
        "baseline": "Fictional baseline: 38%",
        "target": "Hypothesis: 50% after the pilot",
        "measurement": "Cohort comparison over 4 weeks; exclude internal accounts"
      },
      {
        "id": "trust",
        "title": "Make collaboration dependable",
        "metric": "Successful review and export tasks",
        "baseline": "Fictional usability benchmark: 7/12 successful tasks",
        "target": "Hypothesis: 10/12 tasks in the next usability round",
        "measurement": "Moderated 12-task study; report unique participants and failures"
      }
    ],
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "e1",
        "source": "Fictional usability notes / session 01",
        "observation": "Two first-time teams started with an empty board and could not identify the next action."
      },
      {
        "id": "e2",
        "source": "Fictional support review / week 40",
        "observation": "Three export tickets described missing Unicode labels in CSV handoffs."
      },
      {
        "id": "e3",
        "source": "Fictional research / session 03",
        "observation": "A project lead asked for a durable shared review state, rather than another notification."
      },
      {
        "id": "e4",
        "source": "Fictional discovery / session 04",
        "observation": "A specialist needs keyboard navigation and a clear focus indicator on the board."
      },
      {
        "id": "e5",
        "source": "Fictional opportunity note / 05",
        "observation": "Two team leads requested reusable templates; each already has a different workflow."
      },
      {
        "id": "e6",
        "source": "Fictional engineering spike / 06",
        "observation": "An API requires stable permissions and versioned export schemas first."
      },
      {
        "id": "e7",
        "source": "Fictional analytics review / 07",
        "observation": "The activation event name is ambiguous and does not distinguish generated versus saved output."
      },
      {
        "id": "e8",
        "source": "Fictional mobile observation / 08",
        "observation": "Capturing a short note on a phone failed after an interrupted connection."
      }
    ],
    "rows": [
      {
        "id": "starter-templates",
        "title": "Opinionated starter templates",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Teams need a useful starting point without a long setup.",
        "reach": 640,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 7,
        "dependsOn": [
          "accessible-foundation"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e1",
          "e5"
        ],
        "decision": "Provide three editable starting workflows and explain who each is for.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Provide three editable starting workflows and explain who each is for.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Templates preserve original content and support an empty-start option.",
              "Given an existing workspace, applying a template creates a separate draft rather than overwriting it."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 146.285714,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "activation-events",
        "title": "An unambiguous activation event",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "The team cannot distinguish starting a task from delivering value.",
        "reach": 800,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 5,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e7"
        ],
        "decision": "Define generated, saved and shared events with an event contract.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Define generated, saved and shared events with an event contract.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The event dictionary separates draft generation from successful persistence.",
              "Given repeated retries, the first-success metric counts one successful save per workspace."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 128.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "export-integrity",
        "title": "Exports that survive the handoff",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Exported records lose important labels at handoff.",
        "reach": 420,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 1,
        "effort": 8,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "in-progress",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e2"
        ],
        "decision": "Preserve Unicode text, stable IDs and explicit column semantics.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Preserve Unicode text, stable IDs and explicit column semantics.",
            "acceptance": [
              "A CSV export re-imports Unicode and quoted delimiters without changes.",
              "Given a formula-looking label, spreadsheet export treats it as text."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "now",
        "release": "now",
        "releaseIndex": 0,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 105.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "accessible-foundation",
        "title": "Keyboard-first component foundation",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Board interactions lack consistent focus and keyboard behavior.",
        "reach": 500,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 1,
        "effort": 6,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "done",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e4"
        ],
        "decision": "Create a documented focus and tab-order contract.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Create a documented focus and tab-order contract.",
            "acceptance": [
              "An explicit keyboard interaction map exists for tabs, lists and dialogs.",
              "Given a keyboard-only session, every primary action is reachable without a trap."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "done",
        "releaseIndex": -1,
        "reason": "Already completed",
        "rice": 83.333333,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "guided-first-run",
        "title": "A guided first useful result",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "New teams do not know how to progress from the first screen.",
        "reach": 620,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 12,
        "dependsOn": [
          "starter-templates"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e1",
          "e7"
        ],
        "decision": "Guide the user through one complete save-and-share task.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Guide the user through one complete save-and-share task.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Progress survives a reload and the user can skip or resume.",
              "Given a failed save, the UI retains the draft and offers a retry without duplicating the result."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "next",
        "release": "next",
        "releaseIndex": 1,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 82.666667,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "review-room",
        "title": "One shared review room",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Reviewers cannot tell which saved version a comment refers to.",
        "reach": 310,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "effort": 11,
        "dependsOn": [
          "export-integrity"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e3"
        ],
        "decision": "Tie feedback to a version and provide an explicit approval state.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Tie feedback to a version and provide an explicit approval state.",
            "acceptance": [
              "Feedback retains the reviewed artifact ID and its version.",
              "Given two parallel reviews, approvals refer to the correct version and do not silently overwrite each other."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "deadlineRelease": "next",
        "release": "next",
        "releaseIndex": 1,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 45.090909,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "mobile-capture",
        "title": "Reliable notes on the move",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Noor",
        "goalId": "activation",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Interrupted mobile connections can lose a short note.",
        "reach": 200,
        "impact": 1,
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "effort": 13,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "blocked",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e8"
        ],
        "decision": "Prototype a recoverable draft and test the conflict behavior.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Prototype a recoverable draft and test the conflict behavior.",
            "acceptance": [
              "A local draft is recoverable after a simulated interrupted save.",
              "Given two drafts for the same note, the user can inspect both before choosing."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Explicitly blocked",
        "rice": 7.692308,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "public-api",
        "title": "The first portable API surface",
        "team": "engineering",
        "owner": "Jules",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "Integrations need a stable permission and export model.",
        "reach": 120,
        "impact": 2,
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "effort": 20,
        "dependsOn": [
          "export-integrity",
          "review-room"
        ],
        "status": "planned",
        "evidenceIds": [
          "e6"
        ],
        "decision": "Ship a read-only API after the handoff contract is stable.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Ship a read-only API after the handoff contract is stable.",
            "acceptance": [
              "All read endpoints enforce the documented workspace permissions.",
              "Given a revoked token, the API denies access without disclosing another workspace."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "later",
        "releaseIndex": 2,
        "reason": "Fits team capacity after dependencies",
        "rice": 6.0,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": false
      },
      {
        "id": "executive-summary",
        "title": "A weekly executive summary",
        "team": "design",
        "owner": "Mara",
        "goalId": "trust",
        "users": "Project leads and contributors in small product teams",
        "problem": "A summary request has no evidence of recurring usage.",
        "reach": 60,
        "impact": 0.5,
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "effort": 5,
        "dependsOn": [],
        "status": "deferred",
        "evidenceIds": [],
        "decision": "Interview two intended readers before designing another report.",
        "nonGoals": [
          "No automatic external publication in this release",
          "No expansion to unvalidated personas"
        ],
        "requirements": [
          {
            "id": "core-flow",
            "priority": "P0",
            "text": "Interview two intended readers before designing another report.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The discovery record identifies a real decision and required source data.",
              "Given insufficient evidence, the roadmap keeps the idea outside committed capacity."
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "recovery",
            "priority": "P1",
            "text": "Document recovery, ownership and accessibility for this flow.",
            "acceptance": [
              "The handoff identifies an owner and the exact release scope.",
              "Given an unavailable service, the user can preserve their work and understand the next step."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "risks": [
          "Reach and impact are estimates from a fictional discovery set; confirm before committing."
        ],
        "openQuestions": [
          "Who will review the pilot outcome and decide whether to expand?"
        ],
        "release": "unscheduled",
        "releaseIndex": null,
        "reason": "Explicitly deferred",
        "rice": 1.8,
        "deadlineRisk": false,
        "evidenceGap": true
      }
    ],
    "capacity": [
      {
        "id": "now",
        "name": "Now · Foundation",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 20.0,
            "used": 13.0,
            "remaining": 7.0
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 10.0,
            "used": 7.0,
            "remaining": 3.0
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "next",
        "name": "Next · First value",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 27.5,
            "used": 23.0,
            "remaining": 4.5
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 8.75,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 8.75
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "later",
        "name": "Later · Expansion",
        "teams": [
          {
            "id": "engineering",
            "name": "Engineering",
            "available": 22.5,
            "used": 20.0,
            "remaining": 2.5
          },
          {
            "id": "design",
            "name": "Design",
            "available": 6.25,
            "used": 0.0,
            "remaining": 6.25
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "algorithm": "Dependency-ready RICE greedy planning; finish-to-start across releases; indivisible team effort. A transparent heuristic, not an optimal project scheduler."
  }
}